Universal forcing notions and ideals
نویسندگان
چکیده
The main result of this paper is a partial answer to [6, Problem 5.5]: a finite iteration of Universal Meager forcing notions adds generic filters for many forcing notions determined by universality parameters. We also give some results concerning cardinal characteristics of the σ–ideals determined by those universality parameters. One of the most striking differences between measure and category was discovered in Shelah [8] where it was proved that the Lebesgue measurability of Σ 1 3 sets implies ω 1 is inaccessible in L, while one can construct (in ZFC) a forcing notion P such that V P |= " projective subsets of R have the Baire property ". For the latter result one builds a homogeneous ccc forcing notion adding a lot of Cohen reals. Homogeneity is obtained by multiple use of amalgamation (see [4] for a full explanation of how this works), the Cohen reals come from compositions with the Universal Meager forcing notion UM or with the Hechler forcing notion D. The main point of that construction was isolating a strong version of ccc, so called sweetness, which is preserved in amalgamations. Later, Stern [10] introduced a weaker property, topological sweetness, which is also preserved in amalgamations. Sweet (i.e., strong ccc) properties of forcing notions were further investigated in [6], where we introduced a new property called iterable sweetness (see [6, Definition 4.2.1]) and we proved the following two results. If P is a sweet ccc forcing notion (in the sense of [8, Definition 7.2]) in which any two compatible elements have a least upper bound, then P is iterably sweet. (2) (See [6, Theorem 4.2.4]) If P is a topologically sweet forcing notion (in the sens of Stern [10, Definition 1.2]) and Q ˜ is a P–name for an iterably sweet forcing, then the composition P * Q ˜ is topologically sweet. In [6, §2.3] we introduced a scheme of building forcing notions from so called universality parameters (see 1.2 later). We proved that typically they are sweet (see [6, Proposition 4.2.5]) and in natural cases also iterably sweet. So the question arose if the use of those forcing notions in iterations gives us something really new. Specifically, we asked: The first author thanks the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for support during his visit to Jerusalem in Spring'2003. He also thanks his wife, Ma lgorzata Jankowiak–Ros lanowska for supporting him when he was working on this …
منابع مشابه
Rough ideals based on ideal determined varieties
The paper is devoted to concern a relationship between rough set theory and universal algebra. Notions of lower and upper rough approximations on an algebraic structure induced by an ideal are introduced and some of their properties are studied. Also, notions of rough subalgebras and rough ideals with respect to an ideal of an algebraic structure, which is an extended notion of subalgebras and ...
متن کاملIdeals Determined by Some Souslin Forcing Notions
We describe a method of building “nice” σ–ideals from Souslin ccc forcing notions.
متن کاملSpecial Subsets of the Reals and Tree Forcing Notions
We study relationships between classes of special subsets of the reals (e.g. meager-additive sets, γ-sets, C′′-sets, λ-sets) and the ideals related to the forcing notions of Laver, Mathias, Miller and Silver.
متن کاملUltra and Involution Ideals in $BCK$-algebras
In this paper, we define the notions of ultra and involution ideals in $BCK$-algebras. Then we get the relation among them and other ideals as (positive) implicative, associative, commutative and prime ideals. Specially, we show that in a bounded implicative $BCK$-algebra, any involution ideal is a positive implicative ideal and in a bounded positive implicative lower $BCK$-semilattice, the not...
متن کاملFUZZY (POSITIVE, WEAK) IMPLICATIVE HYPER BCK-IDEALS
In this note first we define the notions of fuzzy positive implicativehyper BCK-ideals of types 1,2,3 and 4. Then we prove some theorems whichcharacterize the above notions according to the level subsets. Also we obtainthe relationships among these notions, fuzzy (strong, weak, reflexive) hyperBCK-ideals and fuzzy positive implicative hyper BCK-ideals of types 5,6,7and 8. Then, we define the no...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Arch. Math. Log.
دوره 46 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007